If you were Rizal's defense lawyer, what could have you done to save Rizal's from his death sentence?
1. If you were Rizal's defense lawyer, what could have you done to save Rizal's from his death sentence?
If you were Rizal's defense lawyer, what could have you done to save Rizal's from his death sentence?
Answer:
If I were the defense lawyer of Jose Rizal, I will do something to protect him from the death sentence by studying the entire case. Probably, I will present some important papers, supporting documents to stop authority from pushing him to trial. I will prove to the Spanish authority that their allegation was wrong and it must be corrected before they execute Rizal to death. Spanish authorities during the time of Rizal were very strict, If they heard someone who was against them will be killed. They do not have trials, what they did, was putting someone in prison without a hearing and justice. Spanish times were dark times of all Filipino People.
https://brainly.ph/question/1741453
#BRAINLYFAST
2. If you had been Rizal’s defense lawyer, what could you have done to save Rizal from his death sentence?
Explanation:
how are words arranged in Dictions list after asking help to merriam webster?
3. if you were rizal's defense lawyer what what have you done to save rizal from his death execution how will you defered him from the different cases filed against him.
Answer:
Answer is in the picture
Explanation:
#CARRYONLEARNING4. WHAT IS THE REQUIRED SKILL/S TO BE A LAWYER?
Answer:
memorize all the law and dapat magaling ka
5. How can being a lawyer be a life offered to God with s mission
Answer:
Being a lawyer can be a life offered to God with a mission by using one's legal skills and knowledge to serve others and promote justice. As a lawyer, one has the ability to help people navigate complex legal systems, defend their rights, and seek justice in both civil and criminal matters. By doing so, a lawyer can be an instrument of God's justice and mercy in the world.
6. 1. If you were the lawyer of Rizal during his trial, how will defend JoseRizal?
Answer:
I'LL TRY MY BEST TO DEFEND HIM,, TO REVEALED THE TRUTH, AND ALSO HE IS AMAZING PERSON .
7. in your own words described the tension on the court when rizal read his defense
Initial Investigation
On November 20, 1896, the preliminary inquiry against Rizal began after gathering as much information as possible. Rizal was briefed of the allegations against him before Judge Advocate Colonel Francisco Olive during the five-day investigation.
He was subjected to interrogation without knowing who testified against him. There were two types of evidence presented to him: documentary and testimonial.
Colonel Olive forwarded these evidences to Governor Ramon Blanco, who appointed Captain Rafael Dominguez as the Judge Advocate in charge of determining what action should be taken. Dominguez, after a cursory perusal, forwarded the data to Judge Advocate General Don Nicolas de la Pea for his opinion. Pea's suggestions were as follows:
Rizal must be tried quickly to trial. He must be imprisoned with the required security.His holdings had to be attached, and Rizal had to pay one million pesos as an indemnity.Only an army officer is permitted to represent Rizal, rather than a civilian counsel.I investigated his case and discovered nothing that might implicate him as a participant in, or even the leader of, the revolution. Rizal is innocent as he is, and I ask you to put all biases aside right now because I will establish his innocence at whatever cost.
The first two evidences you presented in this court are documented proofs of letters showing Rizal's connection with Filipino reform in Spain, the implications of Rizal in the Propaganda Movement in Spain, and that and that of which contains his sentiments on deportations to be vital in encouraging people to hate tyranny.
To understand more on Rizal's case, kindly click this link:
https://brainly.ph/question/12895716
#SPJ1
8. AMONG RIZAL’S ARGUMENTS, WHICH WAS THE MOST HELPFUL TO HIS DEFENSE OF FILIPINO?? EXPLAIN...
Answer:
community for readers. Dr. Jose Protasio Rizal Mercado y Alonso Realonda (18... ... More lists with this book. ... I found his arguments that explain the perceived indolence of Filipino.
9. Defense/s of family
Answer:
ano po yung lesson or subj???
Answer:
bahay
bakod
gate
baril
kutsilyo
bawang
asin
ak47
m4a1
awm
groza
10. If you had been rizal’s lawyer, what could have you done to save rizal from his death sentence?
Answer:
Rizal lawyer 0
Explanation:
if i rizal lawyer to exile to a country to change him sentence
11. 3. Among Rizal's arguments, which was the most helpful to his defense ofFilipinos? Explain.
Answer:
noli me metangere
el filibusterismos
Explanation:
word is better than a sword
12. 4. If you had been Rizal’s Défense lawyer, what could you have done to save Rizal from his death sentence?
Answer:
in bagumbayan
Explanation:
I hope helpful
13. Among Rizal's arguments, which was the most helpful to his defense of Filipinos? Explain.
Answer:
[tex] \huge \bold \blue{noli \: me \: eh \: tanghere}[/tex]
It is the most helpful because it awakes filipinos heart about the true freedom.Explanation:
# CarryOnLearning
[tex] \geqslant \leqslant [/tex]
14. 3.The defense lawyers in the impeachment trial (has, have) excellent credentials
Answer:
have
Explanation:
plural subject lawyers
15. if y had been Rizal's lawyer, what could you done to save Rizal from his death sentence?
Answer:
It wouldn’t be a defense so much as a strategy. I’d offer to plead guilty to sedition if the conspiracy and rebellion charges were dropped, pointing out to the prosecutor that Rizal publicly disavowed the revolution and executing him would only add fuel to the fire. Trying to win at trial is a losing proposition, the outcome being fixed, so the best option for my client is to play for lenience.
Explanation:
pa brainliest po
16. If you had been Rizal's lawyer, what could have you done to save Rizal from his death sentence?
Answer:
If I had been Rizal's lawyer, I would have argued that the charges against him were politically motivated and that he was being persecuted for his political beliefs. I would have also argued that the evidence presented against him was circumstantial and insufficient to prove his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Additionally, I would have argued that Rizal had not committed any crime and that his writings were not seditious or intended to incite rebellion. Finally, I would have argued for clemency on the grounds of Rizal's exemplary character and contributions to Philippine society.
Explanation:
Rizal was a Filipino nationalist and political activist who was charged with sedition and rebellion against the Spanish colonial government. His trial was widely seen as politically motivated, and his lawyer would have argued that the charges were baseless and that Rizal had not committed any crime. The lawyer would have also argued that the evidence presented against Rizal was circumstantial and insufficient to prove his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Additionally, they would have argued that Rizal's writings were not seditious or intended to incite rebellion, but rather were intended to promote reform and peaceful change. Finally, they would have argued for clemency on the grounds of Rizal's exemplary character and contributions to Philippine society.
Answer:
If I had been Rizal's lawyer, I would have argued that the charges against him were politically motivated and that he was being persecuted for his political beliefs. I would have also argued that the evidence presented against him was circumstantial and insufficient to prove his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Additionally, I would have argued that Rizal had not committed any crime and that his writings were not seditious or intended to incite rebellion. Finally, I would have argued for clemency on the grounds of Rizal's exemplary character and contributions to Philippine society.
17. If you were Rizal's lawyer in his trial, how can you defend him using the 12 points that Rizal also announced earlier in his proceedings?
Answer:
Defend Rizal as his defense lawyer? On a trial of rebellion, yes. But that trial must be by a civilian court, either in a primer instancia or direct to a special court handling rebellion cases. It must not be a Court Martial or a Military Commission reporting direct to a military governor general.But as things stand in 1896, poor Jose was a cooked goose. The Court Martial has to have the usual suspects, and our doctor-poet-lover (not to say with two novels) and reluctant rebel got a slim margin between the devil and the deep blue sea.The defense will be along the lines of evidence need to convict a person with rebellion charges. Witnesses of the prosecution will be put on the dock and subjected to withering cross-examination questions and physical evidence will be subjected to minute scrutiny, all in accordance with the existing Rules of Court; not in a court martial which fashion its Rules as the trial moves.The 1896 court martial was designed to convict and execute. Eventually, Spain lost her empire.
18. cite and discuss the defense of rizal concerning the charge against him
Writing a book against the spanish people and the country of spanish
19. describe the tension at the courtroom rizal with his defense
Answer:
taekwondo
Explanation:
pag aralan mabuti
20. Explain each of the defenses of rizal in his trial
Answer:
Philippine Studies: Historical and Ethnographic Viewpoints is an internationally refereed journal that publishes scholarly articles and other materials on the history of the Philippines and its peoples, both in the homeland and overseas. It believes the past is illuminated by historians as well as scholars from other disciplines; at the same time, it prefers ethnographic approaches to the history of the present. It welcomes works that are theoretically informed but not encumbered by jargon. It promotes a comparative and transnational sensibility, and seeks to engage scholars who may not be specialists on the Philippines. Founded in 1953 as Philippine Studies, the journal is published quarterly by the Ateneo de Manila University through its School of Social Sciences.
Explanation:
pls brainliest me
21. among rizal arguments which was the most helpful to his defense of filipino
Answer:
1.Vanessa kate
2.meos
3.renegay
4.kerax
5.sungit
6.shai
7.nicey
22. Among rizals arguments, which was the most helpful to his defense of Filipino? Expalain
Yes, everything Jose Rizal did or helped is good for all Filipinos to become aware of the abuse of the Spaniards. So Jose Rizal went to the Philippines from Spain, because the Philippines had the answer to get the Independence of Philippines, and set La Liga Pilipina...
#SaLiK
23. if you had been rizals lawyer, what could have you done to save Rizal from his death sentence
Answer:
If I were the defense lawyer of Jose Rizal, I will do everything to protect him from the death sentence by studying the entire case. Probably, I will present some important papers, supporting documents to stop authority from pushing him to trial. I will prove to the Spanish authority that their allegation was wrong and it must be corrected before they execute Rizal to death. Spanish authorities during the time of Rizal were very strict, If they heard someone who was against them will be killed. They do not have trials, what they did, was putting someone in prison without a hearing and justice. Spanish times were dark times of all Filipino People.
Explanation:
24. if yo had been Rizal lawyer, what could have you done to save Rizal from his death sentence?
Answer:
It wouldn’t be a defense so much as a strategy. I’d offer to plead guilty to sedition if the conspiracy and rebellion charges were dropped, pointing out to the prosecutor that Rizal publicly disavowed the revolution and executing him would only add fuel to the fire. Trying to win at trial is a losing proposition, the outcome being fixed, so the best option for my client is to play for lenience.
25. cite and discuss the defense of rizal concerning the charges against him.
Answer:
1. RIZAL ‘S DEFENSE Preliminary Investigation Two kinds of evidence presented against Rizal: Documentary Testimonial
2. RIZAL ‘S DEFENSE 1. A letter from Antonio Luna to Mariano Ponce dated Oct. 16, 1888, Madrid. 2. A letter of Rizal to his family dated Aug. 20, 1890, Madrid. 3. A letter from M.H. Del Pilar to Deodato Arellano dated Jan 7, 1889, Madrid 4. A poem entitled “Kundiman” allegedly written by Rizal.
3. RIZAL ‘S DEFENSE Tunay ngayong umid yaring dila't puso Sinta'y umiilag, tuwa'y lumalayo, Bayan palibhasa'y lupig at sumuko Sa kapabayaan ng nagturong puno. Datapuwa't muling sisikat ang araw, Pilit maliligtas ang inaping bayan, Magbabalik mandin at muling iiral Ang ngalang Tagalog sa sandaigdigan. Ibubuhos namin ang dugo't babaha Matubos nga lamang ang sa amang lupa Habang di ninilang panahong tadhana, Sinta'y tatahimik, iidlip ang nasa.
Explanation:
Please pa brainliest
Answer:
RIZAL 'S DEFENSE December 11, 1896 Charged with the crime of rebellion, and the formation of illegal associations. ... RIZAL 'S DEFENSE If he was guilty, he should have left the country while in exile; he shouldn't have built a home, bought a parcel of land or established a hospital in Dapitan.
Explanation:
brainliest plsss thank you hope it helps
26. Among Rizal’s arguments, which was the most helpful to his defense of Filipinos? Explain.
Answer:
community for readers. Dr. Jose Protasio Rizal Mercado y Alonso Realonda (18... ... More lists with this book. ... I found his arguments that explain the perceived indolence of Filipino.
Explanation:
27. Among Dr. Rizal's arguments, which was the most helpful to his defense to the Filipinos? Explain.
Answer:
Community for readers. Dr. Jose Protasio Rizal Mercado y Alonso Realonda (18... More lists with this book. I found his arguments that explain the perceived indolence of Filipino.
28. 1. A pilot has a fear of heights.2. The defense lawyer failed to acquit his daughter in a case.What are the similarities and differences of these sentences?How do you call these sentences?asapppp
Answer:
situational irony Because more meaning to a situation making its more meaning interested and thought provoking..
I m not sure my answer is correct
29. 3. What was Rizal's lawyer-defender a Spaniards and not a Filipino?
Explanation:
Taviel de Andrade, Rizal’s defense counsel, argued that in the law applying the Penal Code of Spain in the Philippines, none exists to establish the guilt of the accused; he likewise challenged the veracity and impartiality of those who had given statements incriminating Rizal; he closed his defense requesting the court to reject the images of war, for they could only provoke ideas of vengeance, and that judges should not be vengeful but fair and just30. f you had been Rizal’s lawyer, what could have you done to save Rizal from his death sentence?
Answer:
This is the answer
Explanation:
Pa brainliest po please
